The Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing is an academic center affiliated with the Division of Toxicological Sciences in the Department of Environmental Health Sciences of the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Related Links for CAAT Grants
Previous Grants
Craig Meyers, PhD
Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
The general dogma that skin is merely a protective covering of the body is rapidly changing. New information from in vivo and in vitro studies provides compelling evidence that the keratinocyte can initiate and actively participate in diverse inflammatory reactions. In response to environmental insult, keratinocytes independently release several types of immunoregulatory molecules. Additionally, keratinocytes express adhesion molecules immunoinflammatory associated with reactions, such as the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). keratinocytes can play a pivotal role in allergic Therefore, contact dermatitis (ACD) as well as irritant contact (ICD). We have developed a working hypothesis that an in dermatitis vitro keratinocyte culture system is assessing commercial and therapeutic products to induce ACD and ICD.
A crucial component of testing our working hypothesis is using a proper in vitro keratinocyte system. An assortment of techniques have been tried by various investigators to culture epithelial cells in culture. The organotypic (raft) culture system has been shown to most accurately mimic the in vivo physiology of the epidermis. Growing epithelial cells in the raft system has allowed for a "complete" differentiation program in contrast to what is achieved in monolayer cultures. We propose to evaluate the human epithelial raft culture system for its efficacy as a mechanistic system to test toxicity of commercial and therapeutic products. To accomplish this we will define the expression of immunoregulatory molecules in human epithelial raft culture tissues following treatment with a contact dermatitis inducing chemical. We propose that a set of indices can be defined based on the expression patterns of interleukin-1a (IL-1a), IL-aB, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), transforming growth factor B (TGFB) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) that will allow us to identify contact dermatitis-inducing compounds.
In Specific Aim 1 we will continue to define the expression of immunoregulatory molecules by human epithelial raft culture tissue. This will include:
Our second Specific Aim will be to define the expression of IL-1a, IL-1B, IL-6, TNF-a, GM-CSF, TGFB, and ICAM-1 following multiple exposures with dilutions of SLS and NS that exhibit little or no effect on the epithelial tissue when applied only once. Techniques used to analyze multiple exposed tissues will be the same as used for Specific Aim 1.
The third Specific Aim will be to determine if organotypic epithelial tissues can recover from exposure to dermatitis inducing agents and regain normal epithelial stratified and differentiated phenotype. First, tissues will be treated with SLS or NS as described but following treatment some of the test samples will be incubated for greater time periods allowing more time for recovery. Second, SLS or NS will be applied to only half the organotypic tissue. This is to determine if the untreated epithelium can enhance the ability of the treated half to recover a normal differentiation phenotype. Techniques used to analyze multiply exposed tissues will be the same as used for Specific Aim 1.
Finally in Specific Aim 4 we will continue to study changes in the human epithelial differentiation program as a result of ICD and ACD induction. In correlation with the continued investigations of cytokine expression as proposed in Specific Aim 1, we will also continue to correlate morphological and biochemical changes in the differentiation program. This will include cataloguing disturbances in the differentiation phenotype. As the dilutions of the toxicants become greater we will determine which disturbances in the differentiation phenotype are the most sensitive to insult. We will determine if phenol and urushiol also disturb the differentiation phenotype similar to SLS and NS or are there significant differences.