The Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing is an academic center affiliated with the Division of Toxicological Sciences in the Department of Environmental Health Sciences of the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.

 

Johns Hopkins School of Public Health

Volume 1, Number 1

CAATALYST: A Student Newsletter


CAATALYST \kat-l-est\ n. (1981): 1) An individual or organization working to reduce, refine and replace animal use in the life sciences; 2) an agent that provokes significant change.


Letters to CAAT

Why CAATALYST?

These are a few of the letters we have received this year from middle-school students and teachers. We know from your letters that you care very much about both animals and people and want to learn more about how scientists are working to develop alternative ways to test the safety of the products we use every day.

We decided to create "CAATALYST" so that we can answer your questions and help you to understand why we need to test products, and about the kinds of tests that have been developed as alternatives to whole animal tests. The answers to these questions can sometimes be long and complex, and we cannot answer them all in one poster. We thought that in this first issue we would tell you about our Center, why and how it was started and what we do.

In the next issues of the poster, we will tell you about the progress that has been made in developing alternative tests as well as the kinds of information these tests can give us and when they can and cannot be used. We have chosen "CAATALYST" as the name of this publication because the Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT) has acted as a catalyst for change.

At the time when CAAT was founded, a number of people had become concerned about the welfare of the animals that were used to develop and test products like cosmetics, soaps, shampoos and lotions. They began to ask whether animal testing was necessary. Until that time, animal testing was one of the only ways to learn about the safety of these products.

By law, companies must test their products in order to protect consumers. In response to the concerns of people who opposed animal testing, a group of companies donated $1 million through their trade group, the Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association (CTFA), to found a center dedicated to developing in vitro and other alternative methods to test products and insure their safety. CTFA decided to give the money to the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, where CAAT was founded in 1981.

What is an Alternative Test?

We define alternative tests by the three R's — reduction, refinement and replacement. A reduction alternative is a test that uses fewer animals. A refinement alternative is a test that improves the well-being of the animals. A replacement alternative is a test that uses an in vitro or computer method instead of a whole animal. The idea of the three R's was first described by two British scientists, Russell and Burch, in 1959.

What Does CAAT Do?

CAAT gives money to scientists in the form of grants, to develop methods that may be used as alternatives to standard whole animal tests. In the 13 years since CAAT was founded, many scientific advances have made it easier for toxicologists to design alternative tests. In future issues of CAATALYST, we will explain about some of these alternative tests to help you understand them better. CAAT also works with people in government and industry to keep them informed about alternatives. We publish a newsletter three times a year and other materials like this poster series to inform scientists and the public about the development of alternatives.

Glossary